Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Trial Number 3

Client Number 242

Project Number 1

Trial Purpose:

To evaluate semi-aqueous products for mold release cleaning using heated ultrasonics.

Date Run:

04/08/2005

Experiment Procedure:

Seven products were selected from the lab's database. The products were used at full strength. Products were heated to 120 F using a hot plate. Each product was suspended into a Crest 40 kHz ultrasonic tank filled with water at 120 F. The cleaning solutions were degassed for 5 minutes.

Twenty-one preweighed coupons were first coated with Valspar MR 225 mold release (100-41-4, 1330-20-7, 8052-41-3, 67-63-0, 108-88-3, 110-82-7, 64742-89-8), followed by a second coating with Valspar MR 225 Aerosol (75-28-5, 74-98-6, 100-41-4, 75-09-2). The coupons were placed into a convection oven at 150 F and allowed to cure overnight. After the coupons were cooled to room temperature, a second set of weights were recorded to determine the amount of contaminants were added.

Three coupons were cleaned in each product for five minutes using ultrasonic energy. After cleaning the coupons were removed and dried using compressed air at room temperature. Final weights were to be recorded after coupons were dry and efficiencies were calculated for each product.

Trial Results:

Six of the eight products were effective in removing over 80% of the contaminant mix after five minutes of ultrasonic cleaning. One product, Solsafe 245 removed 111%. Further testing would need to be conducted to ensure damage was not being done to the aluminum substrate and therefore this product was not considered to be effective. Finally, the last product, Canola Gold 110 was found to have removed over 97% of the contaminant even though the initial cleaning efficiency was only 56%. When the coupons were wiped with a paper towel, the remaining cleaner residue was removed resulting in the higher efficiency. A similar improvement was found for two of the three DBE 5 cleaned coupons. Efficiency increased from 83% to 93%. The table below lists the initial weights, final weights and efficiencies for each coupon cleaned.

Cleaner Initial wt Final wt % Removed
Bio T Max 0.0554 0.0054 90.25
  0.0401 0.0028 93.02
  0.0511 0.0006 98.83
Solsafe 245 0.0365 -0.0062 116.99
  0.0422 -0.0030 107.11
  0.0527 -0.0053 110.06
DS 104 0.0413 0.0008 98.06
  0.0422 0.0006 98.58
  0.0426 0.0001 99.77
D Greeze 500 Lo 0.0356 0.0014 96.07
  0.0548 0.0057 89.60
  0.0360 0.0077 78.61
Canola Gold 110 0.0236 0.0166 29.66
  0.0327 0.0090 72.48
  0.0226 0.0077 65.93
SC Maxisolv 0.0463 0.0014 96.98
  0.0444 -0.0008 101.80
  0.0302 -0.0005 101.66
DBE 5 0.0392 -0.0005 101.28
  0.0335 0.0033 90.15
  0.0317 0.0128 59.62

Wiped Surfaces

Cleaner Initial wt Dirty wt % Removed
Canola Gold wipe 0.0236 -0.0002 100.85
  0.0327 -0.0003 100.92
  0.0226 0.0018 92.04
DBE 5 wipe 0.0335 0.0000 100.00
  0.0317 0.0068 78.55
  0.0392 -0.0005 101.28

Success Rating:

Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined.

Conclusion:

The semi-aqueous products were very effective when used with ultrasonic cleaning.

Save Report as a PDF