Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Client #75

Related Images

Project Number 1

Summary:

The clients current cleaner worked well for both contaminants in the first project.

Test Objective:

Find a better degreasing solution

Product Use:

Turbine engines
Trial Number Date Run Purpose Success Rating
0 07/27/1998 To compare current oil vendor cleaner to other aqueous cleaner. A follow up test, usually based on company input.
1 08/06/1998 To compare the current cleaner to other aqueous cleaner. Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined.
2 08/17/1998 To compare the current cleaner to other aqueous cleaner. Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined.
3 09/17/1998 Further comparison of current cleaner with two alternative products. A follow up test, usually based on company input.
4 10/01/1998 Further comparison of the current cleaner to other aqueous cleaners. A follow up test, usually based on company input.

Project Number 2

Summary:

The second project found that hot water was effective in peeling the coating from the nickel alloy.

Test Objective:

To discover different way of removing an adhesive coating.

Product Use:

turbine engine blades
Trial Number Date Run Purpose Success Rating
0 08/11/1998 To replace acetone in the coating removal process Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined.
1 08/26/1998 To evaluate one cleaner and hot water for coating removal A follow up test, usually based on company input.
2 02/16/1999 Request for Information Technology Transfer.