Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Trial Number 2

Trial Purpose:

The purpose of this project is to test SAAFH Window and Solar cleaner for the removal of AATCC carpet soil from Glass and Chrome Plated Aluminum.

Date Run:

02/10/2021

Experiment Procedure:

A total of 18 coupons were obtained and used for this test. 6 coupons were used for each of the 3 cleaners. 9 coupons in total for each substrate, substrates being glass and chrome plated aluminum. The initial weights of the tiles were taken in order to use it as a standard and also determine how much soil was removed after cleaning. The coupons were then soiled with 1 gram of AATCC Carpet soil and baked in an oven at 75 degrees Celsius for 4 hours. These coupons were then removed after the 4 hours and dried overnight. Dried dirty weights were then recorded. The specified cleaners were then used to test cleaning effectiveness on the chrome plated aluminum surface and the glass surface. Each set of 3 coupons (per substrate) were placed in the SLW machine and washed. Two sprays of cleaner were applied to the wypal and two sprays of cleaner was applied to each dirty coupon. The SLW cleaned for 20 swipes (down and back is 1) before removed the set and moving onto the next set of coupons. After all coupons were cleaned with their respective cleaners, they air dried for an hour before final weights were taken and recorded. Effectiveness of the cleaners was then calculated and recorded.

Cleaners Used:

A. SAAFH Window and Solar

B. Windex

C. Krud Kutter 1%

Substrates Used:

  1. Glass
  2. Chrome

Trial Results:

1% Krud Kutter had the highest percentage removal on Glass and on Chrome, 98% for Glass and 95% on Chrome. Next, Windex also had 98% removal on Glass but had the lowest average at 92% on Chrome. Lastly, the SAAFH Window and Solar cleaner was effective for the removal of carpet soil on both substrates and had a 93% removal on glass and 94% removal on Chrome. It worked just as well as the comparative products. 

Cleaner substrate initial wt. of cont. final wt. of cont. % Removed  average % Removed
A 1 0.3710 0.0189 94.91 93.45
0.7143 0.0183 97.44
0.4442 0.0533 88.00
2 0.4895 0.0225 95.40 93.99
0.4391 0.0312 92.89
0.3574 0.0226 93.68
B 1 1.0332 0.0156 98.49 97.90
1.0106 0.0170 98.32
0.9402 0.0291 96.90
2 0.3625 0.0216 94.04 92.56
0.6734 0.0288 95.72
0.2295 0.0277 87.93
C 1 0.9022 0.0191 97.88 97.80
0.9946 0.0233 97.66
0.9110 0.0194 97.87
2 0.7670 0.0244 96.82 94.78
0.3105 0.0200 93.56
0.5206 0.0315 93.95

Success Rating:

Preliminary compatibility tests on substrate coupons encouraging for at least one cleaning chemistry. More in-depth laboratory testing necessary.

Conclusion:

Out of the 3 cleaners tested, cleaner C (1% Krud Kutter window wash) had the highest removal rate, with its best surface removal being on glass. All products removed the soil better on glass than on chrome. Cleaner A (SAAFH window and solar) had a 94% removal rating for both substrates and cleaner B (Windex) had a 97% removal rating on glass but at 92% on Chrome. All were effective for the removal of carpet soil on both substrates. 

Save Report as a PDF