Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Trial Number 3

Trial Purpose:

The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effectiveness of heated immersion with a stir bar for the removal of pitch and protect-o-coat contaminants.

Date Run:

07/16/2020

Experiment Procedure:

Two glass coupons were obtained for each of the six cleaners tested at the following concentrations and temperatures; Smart Solve 605 (100% 150°F), RB Degreaser (20% 180°F), SC Actisolv (50% 120°F), Propylene carbonate (100% 180°F), Dimethyl glutarate (100% 180°F) and SC Maxisolv (100% 120°F). One coupon was soiled with pitch and the other with the protect-o-coat soil and a dirty weight was obtained. When cleaning solutions reached proper temperatures, coupons were inserted along with a stir bar to cause agitation for 30 minutes. When 30 minutes had passed, coupons were removed and allowed to air dry for 24 hours. After the dry step a final clean weight was obtained. Effectiveness of cleaners was determined.

Trial Results:

Cleaner Initial wt of cont. Final wt of cont. % Cont. Removed %AVG
Smart Solve 605 0.5585 0.0029 99.48 94.04
0.0079 0.0009 88.61
RB Degreaser 0.4033 0.3378 16.24 16.24
0.0169 N/A N/A
SC Actisolv 0.5851 0.4175 28.64 13.78
0.0223 0.0331 -1.08
Propylene carbonate 0.438 0.2545 41.9 41.90
0.0269 N/A N/A
Dimethyl glutarate 0.4575 0.0005 99.89 78.58
0.0206 0.0088 57.28
SC Maxisolv 0.7662 0.0007 99.91 95.49
0.0112 0.001 91.07

Success Rating:

Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined.

Conclusion:

SC Maxisolv was the most effective cleaner in removing both the pitch and protect-o-coat soils with an average of 95.49% removal. Smart Solve 605 was the second most effective removing an average of 94.04%. Next step would be to discuss with the company about further testing either in the lab or on-site. 

Save Report as a PDF