Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Trial Number 3

Trial Purpose:

To evaluate CleanCore Aqueous Ozone solution (ozonated water) (at time = 0, 2 & 4 hrs) and a comparative cleaner on removal efficiency from ceramic and chrome substrates

Date Run:

11/16/2016

Experiment Procedure:

Three pre-weighed coupons per cleaner were coated with 0.5 g of Huckers soil, at 68°F(room temperature), using a hand held swab. The contaminated coupons were air dried for 2 hours at 68°F (room temperature) and weighed again to determine the amount of soil added after the 2 hour period.

The CleanCore Aqueous Ozone kiosk machine was turned on and run to generate ozonated water. Ozonated water was collected into the CleanCore Spray Bottle.

Properties of tap water and the ozonated water (directly from the spray hose and the CleanCore Spray Bottle) were measured and recorded throughout the procedure, as necessary, including temperature, ORP values (mV), dissolved ozone levels (ppm), and pH.

Instrumentation used for measurements:
on-machine: dissolved ozone meter - ATi Q45H (ozone in ppm and temp in °F); ORP meter - Black Stone BL982411 ORP Controller (ORP in mV)
handheld instruments: Hanna HI 98121 meter (ORP & temp in °C); Chemetrics Meter with vacu-vials (dissolved ozone in ppm)

At the appropriate time interval, based on the age of the ozonated solution in the CleanCore Spray Bottle (t= 0 hr, t=2 hr, t=4 hr), three coupons of each substrate were placed in the SLW unit and a KC Wypal reinforced paper towel was attached to the cleaning sled and treated with one spray of cleaning solution from the CleanCore Spray Bottle. Each coupon was sprayed once with the same cleaning solution. The cleaning unit was run for 20 cycles (equivalent of 30 seconds of cleaning). Coupons were dried overnight and final weights were recorded. Efficiencies were calculated and recorded.

Three coupons of each substrate were also cleaned with a comparative cleaner (Formula 409 Multi-Surface Cleaner) instead of the ozonated solution, following the same process on the SLW machine and for drying and final weights.

Trial Results:

Ozonated H2O t=0 hrs t=2 hrs t=4 hrs
Temperature 24.1 °C 24.0 °C 23.8 °C
Ozone Levels (in ppm & ORP mV)      
handheld meter (from spray bottle) ORP 4098mV 244 mV 223 mV
meter on machine (during filling) ORP 930 mV    
meter on machine 1.010 - 1.200 ppm    
vacu-vials (soln from hose) 1.06 ppm    
vacu-vials (soln from spray bottle) 0.46 ppm 0.04 ppm 0.01 ppm
temp of water when made 74.3 °F    
pH of water when made 6.5    
tap water - ORP (handheld meter) 287 mV 236 mV 212 mV
tap water - temp (handheld meter) 23.2 °C 23.0 °C 23.0 °C
ozone in tap water (vacu-vials) 0.04 ppm    

Removal

Cleaner Initial wt Final wt % Removed
Clean Core Ozone soln, t- 0 hr 0.2261 0.0659 70.85
Ceramic 0.2293 0.0609 73.44
  0.2586 0.0605 76.60
Clean Core Ozone soln, t- 2 hr 0.2339 0.1069 54.30
Ceramic 0.2509 0.1205 51.97
  0.2370 0.0825 65.19
Clean Core Ozone soln, t- 4 hr 0.2478 0.0488 80.31
Ceramic 0.2339 0.1494 36.13
  0.2398 0.0882 63.22
Formula 409 Multi-Surface Cleaner 0.2317 0.0204 91.20
Ceramic 0.2480 0.0122 95.08
  0.2474 0.0169 93.17
Clean Core Ozone soln, t- 0 hr 0.2376 0.0667 71.93
Chrome 0.2212 0.0631 71.47
  0.2355 0.0457 80.59
Clean Core Ozone soln, t- 2 hr 0.2680 0.0282 89.48
Chrome 0.2441 0.0297 87.83
  0.2289 0.0475 79.25
Clean Core Ozone soln, t- 4 hr 0.2302 0.0434 81.15
Chrome 0.2283 0.0395 82.70
  0.2322 0.0264 88.63
Formula 409 Multi-Surface Cleaner 0.2321 0.0091 96.08
Chrome 0.2293 0.0108 95.29
  0.2387 0.0148 93.80

Ceramic Substrate

CompanyName: Product Name Conc. % Efficiency Effective
CleanCore Aqueous Ozone 100% T= 0 hrs:  73.63  
      T= 2 hrs: 57.15  
      T = 4 hrs: 59.88 No
Formula 409 Multi-Surface 100% 93.15 Yes

Observations (if any):

CleanCore Visual thick residual portions of soil left after cleaning with CleanCore Aqueous Ozone as compared to Formula 409 Cleaner

Formula 409 visual: appreciably greater quantity of soil removed with Formula 409 Cleaner than with CleanCore Aqueous Ozone

Chrome Substrate

CompanyName: Product Name Conc. % Efficiency Effective
CleanCore Aqueous Ozone 100% T= 0 hrs: 74.67  
      T= 2 hrs: 85.52  
      T = 4 hrs: 84.16 No at T = 0
Formula 409 Multi-Surface 100% 95.06 Yes

Observations (if any):

CleanCore Visual more residual soil left covering most of coupon surface for coupons cleaned with CleanCore Aqueous Ozone as compared to coupons cleaned with Formula 409 Multi-Surface Cleaner                    

Formula 409 visual: appreciably greater quantity of soil removed with Formula 409 Cleaner than with CleanCore Aqueous Ozone

Success Rating:

Results successful using TACT (time, agitation, concentration, and temperature, as well as rinsing and drying) and/or other cleaning chemistries examined.

Conclusion:

For ceramic substrate with Huckers soil, the CleanCore Aqueous Ozone Solution had a removal efficiency of 73.63 % at T=0, as compared to the 93.15 % for the Formula 409 Multi-Surface Cleaner. Visually, thick residual portions of soil were left after cleaning with CleanCore Aqueous Ozone as compared to Formula 409 Multi-Surface Cleaner. The CleanCore Aqueous Ozone solution was not effective at removing Huckers soil from ceramic coupons.

For chrome substrate with Huckers soil, the CleanCore Aqueous Ozone Solution had a removal efficiency of 74.67% at T=0, as compared to the 95.06 % for the Formula 409 Multi-Surface Cleaner. Visually, more residual soil was left covering most of coupon surface for coupons cleaned with CleanCore Aqueous Ozone as compared to coupons cleaned with Formula 409 Multi-Surface Cleaner. The CleanCore Aqueous Ozone solution was not effective at removing Huckers soil from chrome coupons (at T=0).

Save Report as a PDF