Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Trial Number 0

Trial Purpose:

To compare the cleaning effectiveness between water, neutral cleaner, and ozone generated water.

Date Run:

02/25/2012

Experiment Procedure:

Water and ozone generated water were used at full concentration (100%). One neutral cleaner was diluted to 0.78% with DI water. Eighteen VCT coupons were coated with Wax three times for test. Before the cleaning, prepared VCT coupons were weighed. Coupon’s gloss levels were measured with gloss meter. After then, eighteen VCT coupons were soiled with Hucker's Soil Formulation (JifCreamy Peanut Butter 9.2%, Salted Butter 9.2%, Arrowhead Mills stone ground wheat flour 9.2%, Egg Yolk 9.2%, Evaporated milk 13.8%, Distilled water 45.8%, Printer's ink with boiled linseed oil 0.9%, Shaws saline solution 2.7%) using a hand held swab and allowed to dry for 24 hours at room temperature. The contaminated coupons were weighed again to determine the amount of soil added. Each VCT coupon was placed into a Gardner Straight Line Washability unit. A Kimberly-Clark Wypal reinforced paper towel was attached to the cleaning sled and soaked with 5 sprays of cleaning solutions ;10 ml of same cleaning solution were poured on each coupon. The cleaning unit was run for 20 cycles (~33 seconds). At the end of the cleaning, coupons were wiped once with a widow squeeze to remove residual cleaning solution. Final weights and gloss were recorded, efficiencies were calculated and recorded.

Trial Results:

Results: the result of gravimetric analysis was not available since the initial coupon’s weight were heaver than cleaned coupons’ weights.

Gravimetric Table

Cleaner Initial wt Final wt % Removed
water with paper towel      
  0.0231 -0.0036 115.58
  0.0516 -0.0054 110.47
  0.0809 -0.0516 163.78
cleaner with paper towel      
  0.0947 -0.1490 257.34
  0.0296 -0.0447 251.01
  -0.0156 -0.0787 -404.49
ozone water with paper towel      
  0.0198 -0.0247 224.75
  0.0040 -0.0209 622.5
  0.0110 -0.0568 616.36
water with red pad      
  0.0152 -0.0472 410.53
  0.0074 -0.0534 821.62
  0.0665 -0.0311 146.77
cleaner with red pad      
  0.0324 -0.0149 145.99
  0.0017 -0.0559 3388.24
  0.0897 -0.0487 154.29
ozone water with red pad      
  0.0042 -0.0795 1992.86
  0.0166 -0.0769 563.25
  0.0469 -0.0564 220.26

OR

Visual Table (gloss)            
Cleaner Wipe unsoiled soiled cleaned %DET AVG
Water paper towel 84.34 49.66 76.25 76.67  
Water paper towel 82.67 40.12 76.54 85.59  
Water paper towel 82.06 54.33 78.03 85.47 82.58
neutral cleaner paper towel 85.14 40.97 81.05 90.74  
neutral cleaner paper towel 84.73 37.23 74.78 79.05  
neutral cleaner paper towel 80.42 46.59 79.38 96.93 88.91
ozone water paper towel 83.45 51.26 76.62 78.78  
ozone water paper towel 80.26 52.94 76.22 85.21  
ozone water paper towel 82.54 52.72 75.44 76.19 80.06
Water red pad 82.07 47.35 77.71 87.44  
Water red pad 83.76 51.24 82.42 95.88  
Water red pad 82.94 50.09 78.62 86.85 90.06
neutral cleaner red pad 79.39 46.25 77.34 93.81  
neutral cleaner red pad 78.66 51.12 80.71 107.44  
neutral cleaner red pad 84.79 52.90 80.50 86.55 95.94
ozone water red pad 83.93 45.66 74.38 75.05  
ozone water red pad 82.66 53.61 73.49 68.43  
ozone water red pad 85.10 38.46 75.94 80.36 74.61

Success Rating:

A cleanliness study, addressing only various analytical techniques.

Conclusion:

The test was not enough to compare the cleaning effectiveness based on certain limitation from the test method.

Save Report as a PDF