Browse Client Types

Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors

Trial Number 2

Trial Purpose:

To evaluate the supplied products for bathroom cleaning using manual cleaning

Date Run:

04/06/2012

Experiment Procedure:

The supplied cleaning products were used at the recommended concentration (4.7Non-acid, 6.25% mild acid). Preweighed chrome, ceramic and fiberglass, coupons were coated with SSL Soil 1 (Bathroom soap scum: All-in-one shampoo and conditioner 28.6%, Dry skin lotion 21.4%, Liquid hand soap 21.4%, Liquid body wash 14.3%, Deodorant bar soap 7.2% and water 7.1%.) using a handheld swab and allowed to dry for 24 hours at room temperature. The contaminated coupons were weighed again to determine the amount of soil added.

Three coupons were placed into a Gardner Straight Line Washability unit. A Wypall X60 reinforced wipe was attached to the cleaning sled and soaked with 5-7 sprays of cleaning solutions. Each coupon was sprayed 7-10 times with the same cleaning solution. The solution was allowed to penetrate for 30 seconds followed by cleaning in the SLW unit for 20 cycles (~33 seconds). At the end of the cleaning, coupons were wiped once with a dry paper towel. Final weights were recorded, and efficiencies were calculated and recorded.

Trial Results:

The two supplied products both removed more than 85% of the bathroom soap scum soil from the surfaces using manual cleaning. The conventional products removed over 90%. The table lists the amount of soil added, the amount remaining and the efficiency for each coupon cleaned.

Cleaner Initial wt Final wt % Removed
Horizon Gleam - ceramic      
  1.4889 0.0016 99.89
  1.0328 0.0011 99.89
  0.0404 0.0057 85.89
Horizon Gleam - polcarbonate      
  0.0202 0.0012 94.06
  0.0168 0.0009 94.64
  0.0260 0.0007 97.31
Horizon Gleam - chrome      
  0.0199 0.0002 98.99
  0.0225 0.0015 93.33
  0.0176 0.0008 95.45
Horizon Premier - ceramic      
  1.2827 0.0026 99.80
  0.0695 0.0101 85.47
  0.6038 0.2032 66.35
Horizon Premier - polycarbonate      
  0.0234 0.0001 99.57
  0.0298 0.0017 94.30
  0.0174 0.0001 99.43
Horizon Premier - chrome      
  0.0406 0.0020 95.07
  0.0164 0.0022 86.59
  0.0212 0.0046 78.30
PC 115 - ceramic      
  0.0423 0.0054 87.23
  0.0498 0.0013 97.39
  0.0323 0.0034 89.47
PC 115 - poylcarbonate      
  0.0482 -0.0006 101.24
  0.0322 0.0003 99.07
  0.0302 0.0014 95.36
PC 115 - chrome      
  0.0416 0.0017 95.91
  0.0309 0.0014 95.47
  0.0171 0.0031 81.87
3M 19 - ceramic      
  0.0271 0.0008 97.05
  0.0422 0.0003 99.29
  0.1162 0.0027 97.68
3M 19 - poylcarbonate      
  0.0220 0.0004 98.18
  0.0187 0.0017 90.91
  0.0219 0.0003 98.63
3M 19 - chrome      
  0.0424 0.0026 93.87
  0.0194 0.0030 84.54
  0.0195 0.0007 96.41

Success Rating:

A follow up test, usually based on company input.

Conclusion:

The two products had an overall average efficiency greater than 85% and performed as well as the conventional cleaning products in their representative class.

Save Report as a PDF