Browse past lab clients by general industry sectors
Trial Purpose:
To test the effectiveness of the removal of adhesives using HSPiP chemistries.
Date Run:
06/10/2022Experiment Procedure:
Pre-weighed stainless steel coupons, six for each chemical (three being tested with unheated and three being tested with heated), were soiled with the Phenolics adhesive soil. Approximately 0.25 g of the soil was applied using a hand held swab. Each set of coupons were manually wiped with a cloth of the same material, one set dipped into unheated and another set dipped into the heated chemical . During this process, any noticeable soil removal was observed and recorded. Coupons were allowed were wiped with a paper towel to ensure no residue of the cleaner, and afterwards final weights were recorded. The efficiency of removal was calculated for each coupon cleaned.
Trial Results:
Heated Treatment Results
Cleaner | Treatment | Initial wt of cont. | Final wt of cont. | %Cont Removed | Average % Removal |
Sec-butyl acetate | Heated (60-70F) | 0.5784 | 0.0656 | 88.66 | 88.76 |
0.5171 | 0.0764 | 85.23 | |||
0.6567 | 0.0500 | 92.39 | |||
2-propanol | 0.4138 | 0.4029 | 2.63 | 2.09 | |
0.3467 | 0.3435 | 0.92 | |||
0.3373 | 0.3282 | 2.70 | |||
di-isobutyl ketone | 0.5938 | 0.0907 | 84.73 | 77.76 | |
0.5272 | 0.1751 | 66.79 | |||
0.4301 | 0.0784 | 81.77 | |||
2-phenoxy ethanol | 0.3791 | 0.3688 | 2.72 | 4.00 | |
0.4380 | 0.4006 | 8.54 | |||
0.2870 | 0.2849 | 0.73 | |||
t-butyl acetate | 0.2700 | 0.1159 | 57.07 | 46.05 | |
0.2710 | 0.1391 | 48.67 | |||
0.2973 | 0.2010 | 32.39 | |||
d-limonene | 0.3751 | 0.0497 | 86.75 | 85.36 | |
0.3391 | 0.0504 | 85.14 | |||
0.4025 | 0.0636 | 84.20 | |||
ektapro EEP | 0.4124 | 0.0347 | 91.59 | 94.15 | |
0.2423 | 0.0072 | 97.03 | |||
0.2510 | 0.0155 | 93.82 | |||
n-amyl acetate | 0.3232 | 0.1351 | 58.20 | 51.73 | |
0.3006 | 0.1332 | 55.69 | |||
0.3046 | 0.1788 | 41.30 | |||
dimethyl glutarate | 0.3134 | 0.3016 | 3.77 | 42.47 | |
0.2018 | 0.1348 | 33.20 | |||
0.9639 | 0.0921 | 90.45 | |||
diethylene glycol monobutyl ether | 0.1727 | 0.1716 | 0.64 | 35.88 | |
0.5009 | 0.2581 | 48.47 | |||
0.4221 | 0.1751 | 58.52 | |||
n-butyl acetate | 0.3183 | 0.1138 | 64.25 | 58.14 | |
0.3310 | 0.1281 | 61.30 | |||
0.3508 | 0.1793 | 48.89 | |||
1-propanol | 0.3743 | 0.3708 | 0.94 | 1.04 | |
0.2696 | 0.2667 | 1.08 | |||
0.3435 | 0.3397 | 1.11 | |||
FAME | 0.3678 | 0.3043 | 17.26 | 17.37 | |
0.4766 | 0.4438 | 6.88 | |||
0.3515 | 0.2532 | 27.97 |
Unheated Treatment Results
Cleaner | Treatment | Initial wt of cont. | Final wt of cont. | %Cont Removed | Average % Removal |
Sec-butyl acetate | Unheated | 0.7258 | 0.0589 | 91.88 | 88.93 |
0.5425 | 0.0725 | 86.64 | |||
0.4250 | 0.0499 | 88.26 | |||
2-propanol | 0.2266 | 0.2235 | 1.37 | 2.14 | |
0.2082 | 0.1985 | 4.66 | |||
0.2999 | 0.2987 | 0.40 | |||
di-isobutyl ketone | 0.2930 | 0.0867 | 70.41 | 76.09 | |
0.3587 | 0.1134 | 68.39 | |||
0.2443 | 0.0257 | 89.48 | |||
2-phenoxy ethanol | 0.6850 | 0.6632 | 3.18 | 3.16 | |
0.7704 | 0.7253 | 5.85 | |||
0.4024 | 0.4006 | 0.45 | |||
t-butyl acetate | 0.1787 | 0.0450 | 74.82 | 68.51 | |
0.1700 | 0.0821 | 51.71 | |||
0.1353 | 0.0284 | 79.01 | |||
d-limonene | 0.5954 | 0.0733 | 87.69 | 77.47 | |
0.3109 | 0.0660 | 78.77 | |||
0.3004 | 0.1023 | 65.95 | |||
ektapro EEP | 0.1711 | 0.0054 | 96.84 | 95.67 | |
0.2421 | 0.0182 | 92.48 | |||
0.2627 | 0.0061 | 97.68 | |||
n-amyl acetate | 0.2469 | 0.0892 | 63.87 | 69.86 | |
0.1964 | 0.0338 | 82.79 | |||
0.2402 | 0.0891 | 62.91 | |||
dimethyl glutarate | 0.4656 | 0.4376 | 6.01 | 5.88 | |
0.4333 | 0.4066 | 6.16 | |||
0.3385 | 0.3200 | 5.47 | |||
diethylene glycol monobutyl ether | 0.2791 | 0.2695 | 3.44 | 4.45 | |
0.3072 | 0.2950 | 3.97 | |||
0.3798 | 0.3573 | 5.92 | |||
n-butyl acetate | 0.2175 | 0.0765 | 64.83 | 53.39 | |
0.1949 | 0.0560 | 71.27 | |||
0.6194 | 0.4702 | 24.09 | |||
1-propanol | 0.3754 | 0.3694 | 1.60 | 1.08 | |
0.3848 | 0.3798 | 1.30 | |||
0.2827 | 0.2817 | 0.35 | |||
FAME | 0.4618 | 0.3827 | 17.13 | 16.91 | |
0.3756 | 0.3553 | 5.40 | |||
0.3010 | 0.2161 | 28.21 |
Overall Average % Removals
Cleaner | Average % Removal - Unheated | Average % Removal - Heated | Overall Average % Removal for Cleaner |
Sec-butyl acetate | 88.93 | 88.76 | 88.84 |
2-propanol | 2.14 | 2.09 | 2.11 |
di-isobutyl ketone | 76.09 | 77.76 | 76.93 |
2-phenoxy ethanol | 3.16 | 4.00 | 3.58 |
t-butyl acetate | 68.51 | 46.05 | 57.28 |
d-limonene | 77.47 | 85.36 | 81.42 |
ektapro EEP | 95.67 | 94.15 | 94.91 |
n-amyl acetate | 69.86 | 51.73 | 60.79 |
dimethyl glutarate | 5.88 | 42.47 | 24.18 |
diethylene glycol monobutyl ether | 4.45 | 35.88 | 20.16 |
n-butyl acetate | 53.39 | 58.14 | 55.77 |
1-propanol | 1.08 | 1.04 | 1.06 |
FAME | 16.91 | 17.37 | 17.14 |
Looking between the average % removal for unheated vs. heated there appears to be little difference in the effectiveness of the cleaner. The two exceptions to this are dimethyl glutarate (36.59% improvement) and diethylene glycol monobutyl ether (31.45% improvement) as they both were far more effective at removing the adhesive when heated. Overall the majority of the chemicals tested were found to be ineffective. The most promising cleaners to proceed with for testing include sec-butyl acetate (88.84%), d-limonene (81.42%), and ektapro EEP (94.91%). Di-isobutyl ketone (76.93%) may also be worth testing in the next trials.
Success Rating:
Preliminary compatibility tests on substrate coupons encouraging for at least one cleaning chemistry. More in-depth laboratory testing necessary.Conclusion:
Further testing is needed to determine the efficiency of the chemicals on other types of adhesives. So far, the most promising cleaners to proceed with for testing include sec-butyl acetate (88.84% overall average removal), d-limonene (81.42% overall average removal), and ektapro EEP (94.91% overall average removal). Di-isobutyl ketone (76.93% overall average removal) may also be worth testing in the future.